Explain 3 problems with a naturalistic explaination for life.
There are three main points of evidence that persist to conflict with naturalistic explanations to life. These three things are a failure to produce or observe spontaneous generation, the widely agreed upon 2nd law of thermodynamics, and the minuscule probability that scientists collaborate on. The first problem arises because of the claim that life arose from spontaneous generation. There has been no recorded evidence of this, no observation of it, and no scientific study that has recreated anything like spontaneous generation. It just isn't possible. The second problem, the second law of thermodynamics, comes from a conflict between evolutionists explanation of evolution, and the law of thermodynamics. The law of thermodynamics says that the universe is going from order to chaos, but evolutionists state the opposite. The third reason is that scientists keep changing their numbers, and their probability for spontaneous generation. The latest number is too big to even type down.
No comments:
Post a Comment